|
MedChemExpress
resource source identifier antibodies anti mouse pd 1 antibody mce Resource Source Identifier Antibodies Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody Mce, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/resource source identifier antibodies anti mouse pd 1 antibody mce/product/MedChemExpress Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
resource source identifier antibodies anti mouse pd 1 antibody mce - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
anti human pd 1 rea1165 Anti Human Pd 1 Rea1165, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human pd 1 rea1165/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human pd 1 rea1165 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
anti-mouse pd-1 antibody Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-mouse pd-1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-mouse pd-1 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
pe anti human cd279 pd 1 ![]() Pe Anti Human Cd279 Pd 1, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pe anti human cd279 pd 1/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe anti human cd279 pd 1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
anti pd 1 antibody ![]() Anti Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
anti pd 1 ![]() Anti Pd 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1/product/MedChemExpress Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
pd 1 pe ![]() Pd 1 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pd 1 pe/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd 1 pe - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
anti mouse pd 1 antibodies ![]() Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibodies, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibodies/product/MedChemExpress Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse pd 1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
anti mouse pd 1 antibody ![]() Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Ex vivo drug testing in metastatic biopsies reveals patient-specific vulnerabilities to cancer targeting and immune activating drugs
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.06.704037
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic illustration of the drug response assay. Created with BioRender.com. TME, tumor microenvironment; IF, immunofluorescence. ( B ) Cellular composition of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) from five NSCLC patients as determined by flow cytometry. ( C ) ATP-based viability of a MPE in different culture media. Each dot represents the mean ± standard deviation (shaded envelope) of n = 5 technical replicates from one representative donor (P179). ( D ) Flow cytometric analysis of MPE viability in HPLM medium. Each dot represents an individual donor (n = 5). P-values were calculated using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. ( E ) Log2-fold change (Log2FC) in cellular composition of MPEs after 5 days in HPLM medium compared to baseline, analyzed by flow cytometry. Each dot represents an individual donor. Samples from n = 5 donors were measured. To illustrate fold changes, cell fractions below the 2%-detection limit were excluded from analysis. P-values were determined using a one-sample Wilcoxon test against zero. ( F ). As for (E), but for marker expression of cancer cells (PD-L1, Nectin-4, TROP2) and T cells (PD-1). ( G ) Cytokine secretion and immune checkpoint expression of MPEs (n = 5) after 5 days of ex vivo culture. Color scale represents Z-scores normalized across patients for each cytokine or marker. nMFI, mean fluorescence intensity normalized to fluorescence minus one (FMO) control. ( H ) Relative cell loss of two non-adherent cell lines following the optimized IHC liquid handling protocol. Dots represent outliers among technical replicate wells across n = 3 biological replicates (384-well plates). P-values were calculated using a one-sample Wilcoxon test. ( I ) Pseudocolor plot depicting MFIs of CD45 and EpCAM signal for all segmented masks of a spike-in of MCF-7 cells in lymph node cells. Cell populations were classified based on manual gating. ( J ) Number of cancer (left) and immune cells (right) detected using our image analysis pipeline. Box plots represent data of n = 10 technical replicate wells. ( K ) Cancer cell fractions in malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) from NSCLC patients (n = 5), determined by EpCAM-based immunocytochemistry. The dashed line indicates the detection limit (10 cells per well) of the drug response assay.
Article Snippet: Cells were resuspended in 100 μL of FACS buffer (1% (w/v) BSA, 2 mM EDTA in DPBS) per 1 x 10 6 cells and stained using the following antibodies: Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-human CD3, clone HIT3a (BioLegend, #300319, RRID:AB_493690), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-human CD14, clone HCD14 (BioLegend, # 325621, RRID:AB_893252),
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Flow Cytometry, Standard Deviation, Marker, Expressing, Ex Vivo, Fluorescence, Control, Immunocytochemistry
Journal: Materials Today Bio
Article Title: Metformin glycyrrhetinic acid binary injectable hydrogel for synergistic tumor immunotherapy via spatiotemporal microenvironment remodeling
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102749
Figure Lengend Snippet: Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the anti-PD-1 group.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Inhibition, Activation Assay, Flow Cytometry, Expressing